Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 22/03/2024
Online Published: 20/03/2024
Abstract Views: 1414
Views PDF: 421
DOI: https://doi.org/10.60137/tmhvn.v69i63.87
Issue
Vol. 69 No. 63
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Le, D. T. N. (2024). Evaluation the result of no packing endoscopic sinus surgery at Post and Telecom General Hospital. Vietnam Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 69(63), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.60137/tmhvn.v69i63.87

Evaluation the result of no packing endoscopic sinus surgery at Post and Telecom General Hospital

Duc Thanh Nhan Le1,
1 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Bưu Điện

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to evaluate effect of the endoscopic sinus surgery without using merocel.
Methods: Crossectional study without control group. From January 2022 through July 2023, 18 patients who underwent ESS were evaluated at P&T general hospital.
Demographic characteristics, medical history, disease extent and surgical procedures were analyzed. Postoperative symptoms and endoscopic findings were evaluated also.
Results: Patients aged 59 years and older account for more than 50%. The patients’ symptoms improved early on the first day after surgery and vanished on the 4th week after surgery (except for nasal discharge ~10%). Abnormal signs on nasal endoscopy also disappeared after 4 weeks. There were no cases of postoperative complications. Nearly 90% of cases are discharged from the hospital 24 hours after surgery.
Conclusion: Endoscopic sinus surgery without using merocel is a safe and efficient technique. Patients felt more comfortable and improved almost symptoms after endoscopic sinus surgery. The hospitation is also shorter.

Article Details

Keywords

endoscopic sinus surgery, synechiae, mucosal edema, crusting

References

1. Bộ Y tế (2015), Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị một số bệnh về Tai mũi họng, Ban hành kèm theo Quyết định số 5643/QĐ-BYT ngày 31/12/2015 của
Bộ trưởng Bộ Y tế.
2. Ngô Văn Công (2021). Khảo sát hiệu quả của phẫu thuật nội soi mũi xoang không đặt bấc mũi. Tạp chí y học Việt Nam, 505(1), 203 – 206.
3. Alexis H. J and Marvin P. F (2009). Complications of Nasal Surgery and Epistaxis Management. Complications in Head and Neck Surgery, 2(41), 531 -541.
4. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, et al (2020). European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps. Rhinology, 58 (Suppl S29),1 – 464.
5. Kengo.K et al. (2017). Evaluation of a new and simple classification for endoscopic sinus surgery. Allergy Rhinol (Providence), 8(3), 118 – 125.
6. Mo.J.H, Han D.H et al. (2008). No packing versus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: Pursuit of patients’ comfort after surgery. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, 22(5), 525 – 528.
7. Peter M. S, William. L and Margaret S.B (2021). Classic Sinus Surgery for Inflammatory Diseases, Tumors, and Tumor-Like Conditions. Head and Neck Imaging, 6, 439 – 489.
8. Zhenxiao.H, Bing.Z. (2021). Comparison of Absorbable Packing versus No Packing in Wound Healing after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. ORL, 83(6), 400 – 411.