Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 19/07/2023
Online Published: 19/07/2023
Abstract Views: 4611
Views PDF: 6883
DOI: https://doi.org/10.60137/tmhvn.v68i60.32
Issue
Vol. 68 No. 60
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Nguyen, H. H., Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, T. H., & Dinh, T. H. (2023). OUTCOMES OF UNDERLAY TYMPANOPLASTY. Vietnam Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 68(60), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.60137/tmhvn.v68i60.32

OUTCOMES OF UNDERLAY TYMPANOPLASTY

Hoang Huy Nguyen , Thi Trang Nguyen, Thi Hue Nguyen, Thanh Hang Dinh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: myringoplasty is the surgical procedure performed to repair a perforated tympanic membrane, with the aim of preventing surinfection and restoring hearing ability.
Objectives: evaluating the outcomes of transcanal underlay myringoplasty. Method: non- controlled intervention study; 43 patients underwent transcanal underlay myringoplasty at National Otorhinolaryngology Hospital, from January 2021 to December 2022. Results: the average age was 36.4 years old. Patients with straight and large canalhad a higher prevalence 60.5%. Healing rate of the tympanic membrane after 6 months was 97.7%. One case developedgrade I atelectasic tympanic membrane 6 months after surgery.The post-operative air-bone gap (ABG) was 13±3.4dB compared to the pre-operative onewas21.2±7.4dB. Conclusions:transcanal underlay myringoplasty with surgical microscope has advantages such as a smaller and aesthetic incision, minimal soft tissue dissection and shorter time of
surgery. Well trained surgeons can use this approach for different sizes and locations of perforation with high success rate.

Article Details

Keywords

transcanal underlay myringoplasty, tympanoplasty

References

1. Brar S., Watters C., và Winters R. (2023). Tympanoplasty. StatPearls.
StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL).
2. Mario Sanna, Middle Ear and Mastoid Microsurgery, Thieme, 2012., . 3. U. Fisch, Tympanoplasty, Mastoidectomy, and Stapes Surgery, Thieme, 2008.
4. Sergi B. Overlay versus underlay myringoplasty: report of outcomes considering closure of perforation and hearing function. :6.
5. Verma RR, Verma R. Transcanal Microscopic vs Endoscopic Type I Tympanoplastyin Dry Central Perforation: A Comparative Retrospective Study. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin. 2021; 13(1):7- 10. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10003- 1364.
6. Jackson CG, Kaylie DM, Glasscock ME 3rd. Tympanoplastyundersurface Graft Technique. In: Brackmann DE, Shelton C, Arriaga MA, Eds. Otologic Surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2010;149.
7. Chen B, Gao X. [Progress in the tests of eustachian tube function]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 30(14):1171-1175. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.14.023