Article Sidebar

PDF
Abstract Views: 0
Views PDF: 0
DOI: 10.60137/tmhvn.v70i74.243
Issue
Vol. 70 No. 74 (2025): Số tiếng Anh
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Nguyen, D. K., Phan, T. H., Pham, V. H., Nguyen, T. T. T., Hoang, N. P., Nguyen, B. H., Pham, T. H., Le, T. M. H., & Phung, T. H. OPTIMIZE RECOVERY AND IMPROVE QUALITY OF CARE: A REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ERAS MODEL IN ENT SURGERY. Vietnam Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 70(74). https://doi.org/10.60137/tmhvn.v70i74.243

OPTIMIZE RECOVERY AND IMPROVE QUALITY OF CARE: A REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ERAS MODEL IN ENT SURGERY

Du Khanh Nguyen1, Thi Hoai Phan, Van Hiep Pham1, Thi Thanh Tra Nguyen, Ngoc Phuong Hoang, Bich Huong Nguyen, Thi Hang Pham, Tu Minh Hoang Le, Thi Hoa Phung2,
1 BỆNH VIỆN TAI MŨI HỌNG TRUNG ƯƠNG
2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University, Hanoi

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRACT


Objective: Review of the application of the ERAS model in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery. Methods: A Scoping review. Results: Of the 67 relevant articles, 4 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The studies showed that ERAS significantly reduced hospital stay, costs, pain, anxiety, and postoperative depression. At the same time, some studies also showed a significant reduction in overall complications such as nausea/vomiting, facial edema, low back pain, urinary retention, and bleeding. Conclusion: The study showed that ERAS brought significant benefits in otolaryngology, including significantly reduced hospital stay, costs, pain, anxiety, and postoperative depression. ERAS was proven to be effective and safe, without increasing the rate of complications.


Keywords: ERAS, otolaryngology, head and neck surgery

Keywords

ERAS, otolaryngology, head and neck surgery

Article Details

References

1. Wu, Y., et al., The application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in chronic rhinosinusitis patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos one, 2023. 18(9): p. e0291835.
2. Ljungqvist, O., M. Scott, and K.C. Fearon, Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA surgery, 2017. 152(3): p. 292-298.
3. Bianchini, C., et al., Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies: possible advantages also for head and neck surgery patients? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2014. 271(3): p. 439-443.
4. Dort, J.C., et al., Optimal perioperative care in major head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction: a consensus review and recommendations from the enhanced recovery after surgery society. JAMA otolaryngology–head & neck surgery, 2017. 143(3): p. 292-303.
5. Chorath, K., et al., Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology: Review of literature. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. 8(02): p. 96-106.
6. Wu, X., et al., Improved perioperative quality of life in endoscopic sinus surgery by application of enhanced recovery after surgery. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2019: p. 683-688.
7. Bertazzoni, G., et al., The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in head and neck cancer: a matched-pair analysis. Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 2022. 42(4): p. 325.