Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 27/09/2024
Online Published: 25/07/2024
Abstract Views: 15
Views PDF: 8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.60137/tmhvn.v69i65.134
Issue
Vol. 69 No. 65
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Nguyen, D. Q. C., Tran, T. N., Duong, H. N., & Nguyen, T. D. (2024). OUTCOMES OF TYMPANIC MEMBRANE REPAIR USING TEMPORALIS FASCIA IN CHRONIC OTITIS MEDIA WITH PERFORATION: EXPERIENCE FROM CA MAU GENERAL HOSPITAL. Vietnam Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 69(65), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.60137/tmhvn.v69i65.134

OUTCOMES OF TYMPANIC MEMBRANE REPAIR USING TEMPORALIS FASCIA IN CHRONIC OTITIS MEDIA WITH PERFORATION: EXPERIENCE FROM CA MAU GENERAL HOSPITAL

Dang Quoc Chan Nguyen , Thanh Nhe Tran, Huu Nghi Duong, Tien Dung Nguyen

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of tympanic membrane repair using temporalis fascia in the treatment of chronic otitis media with perforation at the Department of Otolaryngology, Ca Mau General Hospital.


Methods: A cross-sectional, prospective, analytical study was conducted on 49 patients with chronic otitis media with tympanic membrane perforation, who underwent tympanic membrane repair with temporalis fascia from April 2016 to July 2017.


Results: The female rate (69.4%) was higher than the male rate (30.6%). The age group of 18–50 years accounted for the highest proportion at 71.4%, while patients over 50 years accounted for 28.6%. Conductive hearing loss was the most common type (81.6%), followed by mixed hearing loss at 10.2%. The average hearing loss level was 39.29 dB ± 17.02, with mild hearing loss at 53.1%, moderate at 24.5%, severe at 6.1%, profound at 2%. The tympanic membrane healing rate was 95.9% at 3 months post-surgery, and the average hearing level at 3 months post-surgery was 29.80 dB ± 16.68, with an average improvement of 9.49 dB. At 3 months post-surgery, 67% of cases were rated as good, 28.6% as moderate, and 4.1% as poor.


Conclusions: The use of temporalis fascia for tympanic membrane repair yields a high success rate.

Keywords

otitis media, myringoplasty, fascia

Article Details

References

1. Trần Văn Khen, Nguyễn Tiến Dũng (2010), “Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật vá nhĩ bằng kỹ thuật Underlay trong điều trị bệnh viêm tai giữa mạn tính tại bệnh viện tỉnh Khánh Hòa”, Tạp chí tai mũi họng Việt Nam, số 2, phụ bản 4, tr. 46 – 50.
2. Phạm Thanh Thế, Hồ Lê Hoài Nhân, Đỗ Châu Minh Ngọc, Đỗ Hội (2009), “Đánh giá hiệu quả việc đóng kín lỗ thủng màng nhĩ bằng kỹ thuật Underlay tại bệnh viện Tai Mũi Họng Cần Thơ trong khoảng thời gian 2006 – 2009”, Y học thực hành, số 670, phụ bản 8, tr. 46 – 48.
3.Anant C, Bhuvnesh K.S, Praveen C.V (2015), “Role of Cartilage as a Graft Material for Tympanic Membrane and in Middle Ear Reconstruction”, International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, vol 4, pp. 66 – 72.
4. Huaili J, Zhigang Z (2014), “Cartilage Tends To Be a Better Choice than Temporalis Fascia for Tympanoplasty under the Circumstance of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction”, Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol, vol 1, N0 3, pp.1- 5.
5. John L.D, Michael B.G (2014), “Reconstruction of the Tympanic Membrane and Ossicular Chain”, Bailey’sHead and Neck Surgery-otolaryngologyfifth edition ,Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 2465 – 2486.
6. Mahmood S, Abolhasan F, Ayeh T (2012), “A Short-term Comparison Between Result of Palisade Cartilage Tympanoplasty and Temporalis Fascia Technique”, Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology,vol 3, N0 24, pp. 105 – 111.
7. Sanjana V.N, Jyoti P.D (2014), “Healing and hearing results of temporalis fascia graft Vs cartilage graft (Full thickness and half thickness) in type I tympanoplasty”, Otolaryngology online journal, vol 4, N0 3, pp. 1 – 20.
8.Sunita C, Inita M (2012), “Cartilage–Perichondrium: An Ideal Graft Material?”, Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 64, 3, 208–213.