FIVE YEAR REVIEW OF TREATMENT FOR LARYNGOTRACHEAL STENOSIS AT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HCMC 2019 - 2024

Xuan Quang Ly1,2, , The Hung Bui1, Van Thanh Nguyen2, Thi Nhu Trang Nguyen1
1 Bộ môn Tai Mũi Họng - Khoa Y, Đại học Y dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
2 Khoa Tai Mũi Họng, Bệnh viện Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) in adults has multiple causes, the most common being prolonged endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy. Other causes include laryngeal-tracheal surgery, head and neck trauma, and infections. Accurate assessment of scar characteristics and choosing the correct surgical technique in each clinical scenario are essential for successful outcomes. Treatment aims to restore airway patency and preserve vocal function.

Objectives: to describe clinical and paraclinical characteristics of laryngotracheal stenosis and evaluate the effectiveness of surgery treatment at University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City from 2019 to 2024.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 42 cases of LTS treated from January 2019 to July 2024. Patients were evaluated clinically through detailed history and previous records. The correlation between endoscopy, CT-scan, and intraoperative findings on stenosis characteristics was analyzed. Postoperative outcomes were clinically assessed for ventilation and voice quality.

Results: The study included 42 patients, 10 with glottic stenosis (GS) and 32 with subglottic tracheal stenosis (SGTS). The male-to-female ratio was equal, with the majority in working age (youngest 18 years old and oldest 81 years old). The most common cause was prolonged endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy (61.9%). Isolated tracheal stenosis accounted for 50%, with firm stenosis [1] (fibrosis, chondrification/ossification) being the most common type (61.9%). The degree of narrow stenosis is mainly Cohen [2] II in GS (40%) and Myer-Cotton [3] III in SGTS (50%). Most patients had normal vocal fold mobility (78.6%). Endoscopy accurately assessed stenosis severity in 100% of GS and 93.8% of SGTS cases; CT-scan achieved 100% accuracy for SGTS. CT-scan measurements of stenosis diameter and length significantly correlated with surgical findings (r = 0.946 and r = 0.994; p < 0.01). Treatment methods included tracheal resection and anastomosis, stent placement, and endoscopy. The decannulation rate was 73.8%, and 71.4% of patients had normal voice post-treatment, with 28.6% experiencing voice disorders.

Conclusions: Endoscopy and CT-scan are valuable tools for diagnosis and treatment planning in tracheal stenosis. Treatment choices depend on stenosis severity, comorbidities, and postoperative care capacity. Outcomes indicate improved airway patency and voice preservation for patients. 

Article Details

References

1. Singh SK, Sood T, Sabarigirish K, Swami H, Roy R. Tracheal Stenosis: Evaluation of an Institutional Protocol and Introduction of Novel Surgical Criteria and Scoring System. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 2019;71(4):415-421. doi:10.1007/s12070-018-1567-1
2. Cohen SR. Congenital glottic webs in children. A retrospective review of 51 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. Nov-Dec 1985;121:2-16.
3. Myer CM, 3rd, O'Connor DM, Cotton RT. Proposed grading system for subglottic stenosis based on endotracheal tube sizes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Apr 1994;103(4 Pt 1):319-23. doi:10.1177/000348949410300410
4. Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thuý, Trần Phan Chung Thuỷ, Lương Nguyễn Thanh Thảo. Khảo sát tình hình điều trị sẹo hẹp thanh khí quản tại BV Tai Mũi Họng TP.HCM. Tạp chí Tai Mũi Họng Việt Nam. 07/19 2023;68(60):60-69. doi:10.60137/tmhvn.v68i60.30
5. Pookamala S, Kumar R, Thakar A, Venkata Karthikeyan C, Bhalla AS, Deka RC. Laryngotracheal stenosis: clinical profile, surgical management and outcome. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 2014;66(Suppl 1):198-202. doi:10.1007/s12070-011-0424-2
6. Evermann M, Roesner I, Denk-Linnert DM, Klepetko W, Schweiger T, Hoetzenecker K. In-depth analysis of pre- and postoperative functional outcome parameters in patients receiving laryngotracheal surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 3;65(5):ezae171. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae171. PMID: 38637945; PMCID: PMC11078893.
7. Miles ER, Krishna PD, Dehom S, et al. Voice and Airway Outcomes of Montgomery T-tube Placement in Laryngotracheal Stenosis. J Voice. Jul 17 2022;doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.06.009
8. Rangachari V, Sundararajan I, Sumathi V, Kumar KK. Laryngeal sequelae following prolonged intubation: a prospective study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2006;10(3):171-175.
9. Crimlisk JT, Horn MH, Wilson DJ, Marino B. Artificial airways: a survey of cuff management practices. Heart Lung. May-Jun 1996;25(3):225-35. doi:10.1016/s0147-9563(96)80033-1
10. Puri HV, Asaf BB, Mundale VV, et al. Predictors of Anastomotic Complications After Resection and Anastomosis for Tracheal Stenosis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Dec 2021;73(4):447-454. doi:10.1007/s12070-020-02238-5