EVALUATING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NASAL PYRAMID IN ADULT VIETNAMESE PEOPLE ON 128-SLICE CT SCANS AT THE NATIONAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY HOSPITA

Dao Anh Tuan1, , Nguyen Tuan Son2, Phung Thi Hoa3, Nguyen Nhu Dua3, Nguyen Ngoc Ha3
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy - Vietnam National University, Hanoi
2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy – Vietnam National University, Hanoi.  National otorhinolaryngology hospital.
3 University of Medicine and Pharmacy – Vietnam National University, Hanoi.

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt


Purpose: Providing a basic data of nasal indexes on 40 patients who underwent 128-slice CT scans at the Department of Diagnostic Imaging of the National Otorhinolaryngology Hospital. Subjects and methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study and nasal data were measured on CT films. Results: The width of the base of the nasal bone, the length of the back of the nasal bone and the wings of the nasal bone on the left and right sides were larger in men than in women (p>0.05). More than 50% of the nasal phenotypes belonged to type A according to the classification of the nasal bone by Tae-Sun Hwang and the rest were of type B. The average nasal length and width in men were larger than in women, respectively, in men at 50.97 ± 2.57 and in women at 47.43 ± 2.58 (mm) (p>0.05); The average nasal width in men and women was 40.63 ± 1.86 and 36.63 ± 1.96 (mm) respectively (p>0.05). According to Olivier's classification, the nasal index of the study group was mainly average, and only 1 woman had a slightly narrow nasal index; the remaining 6 people had a wide nasal index. The remaining parameters were all significant to each other through the correlation coefficient and linear equation with coefficients and constants > 0. Conclusion: The indexes in men were larger than in women, but the difference was not statistically significant. The average nasal index according to Olivier and the parameters were all correlated with each other.


Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

 ADDIN ZOTERO_BIBL {"uncited":[],"omitted":[],"custom":[]} CSL_BIBLIOGRAPHY 1.       Casadei K, Kiel J. Anthropometric Measurement. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Accessed October 12, 2025.

2.       Lee MK, Most SP. A Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Instrument for Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty: The RHINO Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(2):e611.

3.       Constantian MB. Jack H. Sheen, M.D., 1925 to 2021. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(3):721-723.

4.       Hohman MH, Fichman M, Piedra Buena IT. Rhinoplasty. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Accessed October 12, 2025.

5.       Freeman SC, Karp DA, Kahwaji CI. Physiology, Nasal. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Accessed October 12, 2025.

6.       Khajuria A, Rupra RS, Daneshi K, et al. A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Published online October 9, 2025.

7.       Cadd B, Khatri H, Mohr S, Oosthuizen JC. Radiological reporting of CT paranasal sinuses: CLOSE to the mark? The Australian otolaryngologists’ perspective. Aust J Otolaryngol. 2022;5(0).

8.       Taglialatela Scafati S, Rasulo M, Göksel A. Low Strip Unifying Hybrid Rhinoseptoplasty: A Novel Classification in Dorsal Preservation Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;154(5):967.

9.       Shen H, Pan X, Du S, et al. AI-based three-dimensional identification of safe harvesting area of perpendicular plate of ethmoid in rhinoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS. 2025;110:229-238.

10.     Tuấn HNA, Khoa TĐ, Phương PTT, Trọng PT, Vân NT. Mối liên quan giữa các chỉ số mũi ứng dụng trong phẫu thuật tạo hình và đặc điểm hình thái vùng mũi mặt ở người việt trên 18 tuổi. Tạp Chí Học Việt Nam. 2024;540(3).

11.     Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, et al. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16(4):615-646.

12.     Hwang TS, Kang HS. Morphometry of nasal bases and nostrils in koreans. Ann Anat - Anat Anz. 2003;185(2):189-193. doi:10.1016/S0940-9602(03)80088-2

13.     Uzun A, Ozdemir F. Morphometric analysis of nasal shapes and angles in young adults. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80(5):397-402.