CORRELATION BETWEEN 22‐ITEM SINONASAL OUTCOME TEST AND HEALTH UTILITY SCORE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS

Hoàng Phước Minh1, , Doan Thi Thuy Hien2, Nguyen Nhu Nguyen Anh2, Nguyen Tran Thanh Thao2, Nguyen Thi Cam Nhung2, Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang2, Le Thi Kim Tien2, Ha Thi Long Thuy2
1 Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế
2 Department of Otolaryngology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Vietnam

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a widespread inflammatory condition with significant health and economic impacts. The health utility score (HUS) is used to evaluate patients' perceptions of their overall health; however, data on the HUS specifically for CRS is still limited.
Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted with 57 patients with CRS scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The preoperative (baseline) demographics, 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), and endoscopic and CT scores were recorded.
The HUS was assessed through four methods: the EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 level (EQ-5D- 5L), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Short Form Health Survey-6-Dimension(SF-6D), conducted at baseline and three months following surgery.
Results: The mean baseline HUS scores by EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D were 0.77, 0.67, and 0.71, respectively. The postoperative HUS significantly improved to 0.94, 0.89, and 0.92 at three months. The overall improvement in HUS scores ranged from 0.14 to 0.22 after the operation. VAS consistently recorded the lowest HUS values across all time points among the three methods. There were moderate correlations between SNOT-22 and HUS values assessed by EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D. The coefficients were -0.60, -0.57, and -0.56, respectively.
Conclusion: The HUS of patients with CRS improved significantly after receiving ESS. The SNOT-22 consistently correlated strongly with HUS, regardless of the method used.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

1. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;58(Suppl S29):1-464
2. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54
3. Lipman SA, Brouwer WBF, Attema AE. What is it going to be, TTO or SG? A direct test of the validity of health state valuation. Health Econ. 2020;29(11):1475-1481
4. Ference EH, Stubbs V, Lidder AK, et al. Measurement and comparison of health utility assessments in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(10):929-936
5. Remenschneider AK, Scangas G, Meier JC, et al. EQ-5D-derived health utility values in patients undergoing surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(5):1056-1061
6. Soler ZM, Wittenberg E, Schlosser RJ, Mace JC, Smith TL. Health state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(12):2672-2678
7. Beswick DM, Mace JC, Soler ZM, et al. Socioeconomic status impacts postoperative productivity loss and health utility changes in refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019;9(9):1000-1009
8. Hoehle LP, Phillips KM, Bergmark RW, Caradonna DS, Gray ST, Sedaghat AR. Symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis differentially impact general health-related quality of life. Rhinology. 2016;54(4):316-322
9. Hoehle LP, Phillips KM, Speth MM, Caradonna DS, Gray ST, Sedaghat AR. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for the EQ-5D in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2019;57(2):110-116
10. Bewick J, Morris S, Hopkins C, Erskine S, Philpott CM. Health utility reporting in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(1):90-95
11. Sangubol M, Snidvongs K, Lawpoolsri S, Mongkolkul K, Kowatanamongkon P, Chitsuthipakorn W. Health Utility Score in Thai Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Pre- and Postoperative Analyses. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(5):2070-2076
12. Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34(5):447-454
13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-349
14. Lund VJ, Kennedy DW. Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(3 Pt 2):S35-S40
15. Lee JT, Kennedy DW, Palmer JN, Feldman M, Chiu AG. The incidence of concurrent osteitis in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis: a clinicopathological study. Am J Rhinol. 2006;20(3):278-282
16. Psaltis AJ, Li G, Vaezeafshar R, Cho KS, Hwang PH. Modification of the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scoring system improves its reliability and correlation with patient-reported outcome measures. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(10):2216-2223
17. Snidvongs K, Dalgorf D, Kalish L, Sacks R, Pratt E, Harvey RJ. Modified Lund Mackay Postoperative Endoscopy Score for defining inflammatory burden in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2014;52(1):53-59
18. Mai VQ, Sun S, Minh HV, et al. An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Vietnam. Qual Life Res. 2020;29(7):1923-1933
19. Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116671725